Capability and Standards Structure

ID

Each Capability and Standard has a unique identifier composed of one letter followed by a number. The letter "C" indicates a Capability and an "S" indicates a Standard. The number is arbitrary and does not have any additional meaning such as priority, sequence or inter-relationships. This allows for the identification of Capabilities and Standards in a consistent manner.

Version

Each Capability and Standard has a version number. Each Capability and Standard can change independently and its version number will change accordingly. Version numbers are subject to change depending on the nature of the change (e.g. major, minor, patch). There is no relationship between the version numbers of different Capabilities and Standards.

Type

Categorises as a Capability or a Standard and, where applicable defines the type of Standard:

• Capability

• Interoperability Standard

• Overarching Standard

• Capability Specific Standard

• Context Specific Standard

Category

Category used to group Capabilities on the Buying Catalogue

Status

Each Capability and Standard will have one of five statuses:

• Draft

• Published 

• Effective

• Deprecated

• Retired

Effective Date

Those Standards that are mandated under the Catalogue Agreement will have an Effective Date by which Suppliers must comply with the Standard.  

Suppliers will need to have achieved compliance against all Effective Standards (see Status above) in order to onboard on to the Catalogue. There may be other Standards that Suppliers need to achieve compliance with as part of the Framework Agreement in order to be awarded a place on a Framework.

Framework(s)

Indicates the commercial Frameworks a Capability or Standard is applicable to

Description

A concise description of the purpose of the Capability covering the mandatory scope.

Outcomes

The Outcomes section describes the main users of the Capability and the outcomes they want to achieve from using a Solution that meets the Capability based on the mandatory scope.

Epics and Acceptance Criteria

Epics are individual high level business requirements and describe features relevant to the Capabilities they belong to. All Epics together define the full scope of a Capability.

The Acceptance Criteria associated with an Epic define the minimum expected functions a Supplier’s Solution must deliver and are test scenarios that will be used during Capability Assessment stage of Onboarding to establish whether a Supplier’s Solution meets the Epic or not. In order to pass any Epic, all associated Acceptance Criteria for that Epic must pass the assessment.

Epics are classified as either Must or May Epics and all Epics will be assessed during the Capability Assessment stage of Onboarding. It is recommended that Suppliers consider all Epics as part of User Research to understand what the Minimal Viable Product (MVP) is for their users.

Must Epics

Must Epics are mandatory and used to confirm during Capability Assessment stage of Onboarding that a Solution delivers the minimum required for a Capability. A Supplier Solution needs to meet all Must Epics in order to Pass Capability Assessment for a Capability unless it is indicated on the Capability that a Partial Pass is acceptable.

If the Capability is identified as a Capability that can either be offered as Full or Partial Capability, at least one Must Epic must be passed for that Capability to be accepted. If all Must Epics of this type of Capability are accepted the Capability will be accepted as a Full Capability; if at least one but not all Must Epics are accepted the Capability will be accepted as a Partial Capability.

May Epics

Describes additional functionality associated with the Capability. These Epics are not mandatory, however it is recommended a Supplier considers all MAY Epics. Which MAY Epics a Supplier chooses to implement should be determined by their User Research. All May Epics and Acceptance Criteria will be evaluated during the Capability Assessment Stage of On-boarding. Any May Epics that are assessed as met will be available to buyers to support them when comparing Solutions on the Buying Catalogue..

Additional Implementation Details

Additional Implementation Details are mandatory details related to a specific Epic and could be assessed during the Assurance stage of Onboarding.

These details can include references to other Standards and Suppliers will need to complete any separate assurance activities related to those Standards.

Supporting Information

This information may be useful to Suppliers when implementing the related Epic, but is not mandatory and is for guidance only.

Overarching Standards

Overarching Standards apply to all Suppliers irrespective of the Capabilities their Solutions support.

Suppliers will be assured against Overarching Standards during the Standards Assessment stage of Onboarding.

Interoperability Standard

This Standard provides a single place for Suppliers to find out which interfaces they need to implement and to access the required documentation. It also contains overarching requirements that apply to all interfaces in the scope of the Interoperability Standard which are offered by a Solution.

Roadmap

The Roadmap section summarises future changes and opportunities for Suppliers in relation to the Capability or Standard. These are linked to the individual Roadmap pages which provide further information on the Roadmap item.

Requirement ID

Each requirement within a Standard will have a unique ID so it can be recognised during compliance

Requirement Text

The description of each requirement within a Standard that will be used to determine compliance of a Solution with the Standard

Requirement Level

Each requirement within a Standard will have a level as defined in RFC 2119.1, the Change Management and Roadmap Content ancillary document and the Master Glossary